Thursday, July 28, 2011

Black Box To Acquire Cisco Video Specialist PS Technologies

Network services giant Black Box will acquire PS Technologies, a Dayton, Ohio-based solution provider specializing in Cisco video and TelePresence deployments.
Financial terms of the agreement, which was announced Tuesday, were not disclosed. Lawrence, Pa.-based Black Box said in a statement that PS Tech's annual historical revenue has been about $28 million. Black Box, a Cisco Gold partner, is ranked No. 27 on CRN's 2011 VAR500 list.
PS Tech is a Cisco TelePresence Video Master certified partner, and offers products and services in the U.S. Europe and the Pacific Rim. It also sells Polycom video products and services, and has a substantial healthcare and public sector practice, including a General Services Administration (GSA) schedule.
"The entire team is very excited to join our video capabilities and industry knowledge with Black Box," said Leo Flotron, PS Tech president, in a statement. "Our strategy has always been to provide superior video communications solutions to our clients. We believe that combining resources with Black Box enhances our ability to serve our clients in the emerging video communications market."
The entire PS Tech team is expected to join Black Box, according to the company. Flotron will report to Julie Lyda, Black Box's vice president and general manager.
"They have earned a great reputation as a high-quality video service provider," Lyda said in a statement. "The addition of PS Tech to the Black Box family will greatly enhance our organic Cisco capabilities in the video and teleconferencing space."
For its fiscal 2011 ended March 31, Black Box reported $1.1 billion in revenue, up 11 percent year-over-year from $961 million in its fiscal 2010. For its fiscal 2012, Black Box said in a recent earnings statement it will target revenues of $1.125 billion to $1.145 billion.

Juniper Q2 Profits Decline On Mixed Product Sales, Sluggish Market

Juniper Networks on Tuesday reported lower-than-expected growth in year-over-year second quarter revenue and earnings as well as a lowered guidance, causing investors to severely punish the company's stock prices in after-hours trading.
Macroeconomic factors and a drop in Juniper's service layer technology products including its security offerings led to investor concerns despites the networking company's strong core product growth.
Juniper also said it expects its sales through a long-term relationship with Dell  to continue despite the potential complications caused by Dell's announcement last week of its intent to acquire rival networking product vendor Force10.
For its second quarter, which ended June 30, Juniper reported revenue of $1.1 billion, up 15 percent over the $978 million the company reported during the second quarter of 2010.
This included a 21 percent increase in router product and services revenue to $762 million, as well as a 33 percent jump in switch product and services revenue to $122 million. However, these were offset somewhat by a 9 percent drop in service layer product and services revenue to $236 million.
Revenue from North America grew 17 percent to reach $579 million.
Juniper also reported income for the second quarter of $115.6 million, or 21 cents per share, which was down 12 percent from the $130.5 million or 24 cents per share it reported last year. Analyst consensus for the quarter had been for Juniper to earn 27 cents per share.
Looking forward, Juniper expects third quarter revenue to be between $1.017 billion and $1,120 billion, or nearly flat compared to last year's third quarter. The company also expects non-GAAP earnings per share of between 26 cents and 30 cents, down sharply from last year's reported 32 cents per share and analysts' consensus of 31 cents per share.
"We believe the long-term fundamentals of our business remain strong," said Robyn Denholm, Juniper CFO.
Investors reacted sharply to Juniper's second quarter results and full-year expectations, driving the company's stock price down nearly 17 percent to $25.99 per share in after-hours trading about three hours after markets closed.
Juniper CEO Kevin Johnson cited several factors impacting the company's second quarter results and full-year 2011 guidance.
On the macroeconomic side, the European debt situation, uncertainty in the Japanese market after this Spring's massive earthquake and tsunami, and continued consumer weakness held back business during the second quarter.
Business in the second half of 2011 could be impacted in four ways, Johnson said.
The first is the guidance being provided by service providers, which are not following normal historical patterns. They have been guiding revenue for the first half and second half of 2011 that is about equal, whereas the historical guidance called for 55 percent to 57 percent of revenue to be recorded in the second half, Johnson said.
Juniper is also predicting some impact from lower enterprise and government customer IT budgets as well as from a lack of clarity as to when Japan's capital investment will restart, Johnson said.
Johnson also said that Juniper also saw some sales opportunities that were expected to close in the second quarter actually close early this quarter. "This is a signal to us that customers are aware of the macro situation in deciding which side of the boundary to land on," he said.However, Johnson tempered that with some optimism which he said is coming from a strong-growing mobile Internet and cloud business combined with some new products expected to be available in the second half of the year and early next year.
Johnson said Juniper's upcoming QFabric architecture has received several significant wins, and is expected to be released by the end of the third quarter.
Juniper is also seeing continued growth in its core router and switch business, which Johnson said increases momentum for the company's other products.
He also cited recent realignments of the company's system division and the hiring of former Microsoft software solutions head Bob Muglia, along with a recent realignment of the company's top sales executives, as positive impacts on Juniper's business going forward.
When asked during the question-and-answer portion of Tuesday's analyst conference call about the impact Dell's pending acquisition of Force10 might have on Juniper, Johnson said the relationship is more complicated than in the past but that the impact should be limited.
OEM sales to both IBM and Dell have not kept up with those two partners' sales of Juniper-branded products, Johnson said.
He also said he had a call with Michael Dell, chairman and CEO of Dell, after the Force10 acquisition was unveiled, during which the two agreed that they would work to grow their companies' relationship.
"I agree it's more complicated now because of the overlap in products. . . . Our intent is to create a good relationship with Dell," he said.

Cover Story: VMware's Maritz Aims To Run The Table In Cloud


VMware CEO Paul Maritz

As technology industry CEOs go, VMware's Paul Maritz is as unassuming as they come. But don't be fooled by his low-key disposition and kindly college professor demeanor. Maritz is a stone-cold assassin -- at least when it comes to dealing with IT industry competition. As it turns out, this skill is very well suited to the evolving chess game known as cloud computing, in whichVMware and its rivals are essentially starting out at square one.
At Microsoft , Maritz was widely considered the No. 3 executive behind Bill Gates and Steve Ballmer, and by the time he left the software giant in 2000 his canny ability to checkmate one competitor after another -- think WordPerfect, Lotus and Netscape -- had become the stuff of company legend. During Maritz's tenure, Microsoft also came to realize that office productivity software was best sold as an integrated suite, as opposed to point products, and this led to the creation of Office.

These days, Maritz is making moves--and taking some calculated risks--to help VMware leverage its lofty position as the virtualization software market leader into a dominant one in cloud computing. And he's stepping up his game when it comes to pushing VMware's products as an integrated cloud infrastructure stack.
Maritz and company have just released the largest simultaneous product update in the company's 13-year history, which includes VMware vSphere 5, the first major update to its cloud operating system. Other parts of VMware's cloud infrastructure stack, including vShield, vCloud Director and Site Recovery Manager, part of the vCenter product family, have been imbued with features that automate IT processes that used to require human intervention. In other words, VMware has made them more cloudlike.
Maritz would probably cringe at the comparison, but there's an argument to be made that VMware is becoming the Microsoft of the cloud -- with a hand in everything from the cloud operating system to the applications -- collecting tolls for all the services it provides along the way. At any rate, VMware's aggressive charge into the cloud stands to dramatically impact the balance sheet of solution providers that have built huge services business around VMware virtualization software.
If virtualization is a cloud stepping stone, then VMware's updated cloud infrastructure stack represents a smoothly paved roadway, one that gives customers and partners the performance and scalability to build cloud services businesses and the security and disaster recovery to maintain IT operations on the back end.
If that weren't enough, Maritz has been busy gobbling up some of the industry's best and brightest IT talent, recruiting two of Google's top engineers to help build Cloud Foundry, a Platform-as-a-Service for the next generation of cloud applications.
"We're trying to shoot ahead and take some risks," said Maritz in an interview with CRN in late June. "We think there are big changes coming in both how applications are developed and how they're provisioned and consumed. And this is the time to try and get ahead."
Just how far ahead does Maritz want to get? To say he has his troops thinking big would be an understatement. In a YouTube recruiting video from the Americas Partner Operation Sales team, Bob Crissman, senior director, Americas partner operation sales team, said he sees no reason why the company can't move from $3 billion to $50 billion in annual revenue.
"We are not going to be just the infrastructure for the cloud," said Crissman. "We are going to be the cloud."
This kind of ambition comes with a price, however. In the case of vSphere 5, VMware customers are angry over licensing changes that will require some to pay more for the virtualization infrastructure they already have in place. VMware previously pegged vSphere licensing to the number of server cores, but vSphere 5 licensing is based on the amount of memory that customers allocate to virtual machines on the host.
VMware said the new licensing model better reflects the cloud delivery model. But selling the future is no easy proposition, and while VMware channel partners can grasp the significance of VMware's cloud infrastructure stack updates, not all are ready to commit to the investment that deploying it will require.
"Cloud is still an issue where people still don't quite know what it's going to mean for their organization, in terms of how to manage IT, structure internal IT departments, etc.," said Maritz.The strategic significance of VMware's cloud infrastructure stack can't be overestimated. VMware expects VARs to use it to build private clouds -- both for their customers and within their own organizations. VMware also expects service provider partners to use its cloud stack to build public clouds. In a sense, VMware's cloud stack will be the linchpin for the hybrid cloud service delivery model that VMware believes will become the primary way most enterprises adopt cloud computing.
Aware of the channel's power in driving customer demand, VMware plans to offer incentives to partners that sell and position its cloud stack as a suite of products to their customers, said Carl Eschenbach, VMware's president of customer operations.
"We're focused on building out a private cloud suite that includes all of our products, and over time we will package it as such so that it's easier for the channel to sell," Eschenbach told CRN.
Eventually, VMware intends to give its channel an all-inclusive private cloud data center SKU, although Eschenbach said VMware needs to integrate its cloud portfolio more tightly to make this possible. "Today there isn't a single SKU that pulls it all together, but that's the direction we're going as a company," he said.
The VMware Service Provider Program includes traditional service providers like Verizon and SingTel as well as traditional channel partners. Getting these two parties working in concert is one of the biggest near-term challenges VMware faces, as many solution providers are quite comfortable with selling private cloud but are less enthused about working with service providers.
VMware has mapped out several paths partners can take, one of which involves steering customers to public cloud service providers and collecting referral fees. Understandably, many VARs aren't keen on the idea of referring customers and potentially seeing them defect to these companies.
"By asking solution providers to evolve to collecting agency fees from service providers, will this erode margins and force us to either expand and become service providers, or shrink and reduce the transactional VMware business we've built our organizations around?" asked Dan Weiss, CEO and co-founder of Varrow, a Greensboro, N.C.-based VMware partner.
In another scenario, solution providers will resell a service provider's public cloud offerings to their own customers. But it remains to be seen if this option will take root as VMware envisions. One VMware partner and VAR500 solution provider said service providers aren't interested in working with partners because they feel they can get the job done on their own.
"Service providers don't want to have partners reselling their stuff because they feel like they'll be giving away margin to partners. So it really doesn't work in execution," said the solution provider, who requested anonymity. "Bottom line is that service providers don't want to partner."
According to VMware, VARs can also move to the cloud by renting co-location space from service provider data centers, and either offer their own white-label cloud offerings or set up a cloud offering in their own data center, if they have one.
VMware is aware of the uneasiness that's percolating in its channel and is endeavoring to explain how working with service providers will actually open up more business.
"We actually see this as a very big opportunity for our traditional partners to leverage and monetize the cloud, either themselves or in partnership with the service providers," said Eschenbach. "But we're not going to make it a competitive environment. We have to bridge the gap between the traditional service providers and our solution providers."
What about partners that either don't want to make the jump or simply can't make it work business-wise? Eschenbach said these VARs will not get left behind, estimating that 80 percent to 85 percent of apps will still be running in a private data center -- the traditional bailiwick of the VMware solution provider.
VMware's guidance on cloud has centered on the message that partners can find their niche in the new and unfamiliar landscape.
"They've told us that by allying ourselves with cloud service providers, we'll be able to transform our businesses and become cloud brokers in the future," said Weiss. "They've also said the solution provider of tomorrow may be a cloud provider with a more boutique, high-touch model. We don't all have to be Amazons -- there's also a need for channel partners that address a certain segment of the market."
Unsurprisingly, VMware partners that are already well established in the cloud aren't as concerned with the implications of the changing channel dynamic.
"What partners fear is the movement away from the private cloud, which is where they have control of the account. But those perceptions are off base," said Keith Norbie, vice president of sales at Nexus Information Systems, Minnetonka, Minn. "There are a number of service provider players that are going to make it very attractive for clients to move workloads into a public cloud."
VMware often talks about the IT spending "drag" that VARs can take advantage of when rearchitecting their customers' data centers for cloud computing.
Doug Smith, VMware's senior director of global partner strategy and operations, told CRN in March that $1 of VMware licensing generates an additional $15 in IT spending that partners can potentially capture. This obviously doesn't apply when VARs work with public cloud providers, but there are still ways that partners can form financially fruitful relationships with these companies.
World Wide Technology, Maryland Heights, Mo., helps service providers architect their public clouds and works with customers to build private clouds. WWT is formalizing partnerships with several cloud service providers, and channel conflict hasn't been an issue, said Scott Miller, director of business development for virtualization and cloud.
"In today's market, we're seeing cloud service providers pretty focused on making money on Infrastructure-as-a-Service exclusively," said Miller. "They haven't shown interest in evolving into managing IT-as-a- Service because that takes a different level of expertise than what they've invested in, and hence, comes with more risk."
WWT is developing marketing collateral that spells out how to team with VMware service provider partners during the sales cycle. "Cloud service providers don't have that go-to-market capability. Most of the ones that went to market initially thought they were going to go direct, but now they're realizing that a lot of the demand comes from the channel and that they need an offering that makes sense," said Miller.
Mike Strohl, president of Entisys, a Concord, Calif.-based virtualization solution provider, agrees. "A lot of the cloud offerings from service providers lack clear direction about how to overlay the technology that will make them function at a level that meets customer requirements," Strohl said. "The reseller opportunity is to provide the consulting and integration services between on-premise systems and those that sit in the cloud, wherever it may be."
Ahead, a Chicago data center solution provider, is another VMware partner building relationships with multiple cloud service providers. Eric Kaplan, vice president of engineering, is helping clients understand the requirements for hosting applications in the cloud, the cloud pricing models and how service level agreements are structured.
Armed with this knowledge, Ahead is starting to help clients host applications in service providers' data centers, paving the way to a hybrid cloud deployment model.
VMware is gaining momentum in leading its traditional channel into the cloud, but there's another barrier: legacy enterprise applications. Maritz has pointed to older application code as the most formidable obstacle standing in the way of customers' cloud migration. Cloud Foundry, the open-source Platform-as-a-Service VMware unveiled in April, is a bid to become the PaaS of choice for developers to rewrite older apps so they'll run well on private clouds.
VMware is piloting a commercial multitenant public cloud PaaS service that's slated for launch in the first half of 2012 and is leading an open-source Cloud Foundry project under the Apache 2 license. Cloud Foundry reflects its belief that the popularity of programming frameworks like Spring, Ruby and Node.js will continue to grow.
"Our view is that there's a new generation of developers who will be building a new generation of applications, and we're trying to accommodate them on our platform and also have the business opportunity," Maritz said.
Cloud Foundry is based on technology gained from VMware's 2009 acquisition of SpringSource, and it includes the collaboration of Mark Lucovsky, technical director, and Derek Collison, chief architect of the Cloud Services division, both of whom VMware recruited from Google.
"Our view is inevitably someone would do something like Cloud Foundry, so rather than wait for it to happen and have to react to it, we're putting our hat in the ring and pre-emptively offering something there,"said Maritz.
The challenge VMware faces with Cloud Foundry is that, for the most part, its traditional channel doesn't have in-house development expertise. "The only partners doing Cloud Foundry are super-high-end, and it will take awhile before it gets down to the level where everyone can adopt it," said one VMware partner, who requested anonymity. "We're looking for VMware to wean the market and show us how to monetize Cloud Foundry. They're able to explain how it works for them, but so far they're not able to explain how it's going to work for me."
Eschenbach expects Cloud Foundry to appeal to VMware partners with cloud infrastructure expertise that are ready to take the next step into app development. But he acknowledged that Cloud Foundry will be driven, at least in part, by partners with which VMware hasn't worked in the past.
In the end, Maritz believes that VMware's track record with virtualization can help convince customers and partners that despite the uncertainty over moving to the cloud, it's a decision they won't regret.
"This is an issue that we increasingly have to come to grips with as we talk to our customers and explain to them that there are different ways to think about this. My sense is that cloud is where virtualization was four or five years ago. We're going to see the same cycle play through," he said.

Dell: Force 10 Deal Will Beef Up Our Networking Channel

Dell plans to develop a much more robust networking channel following the acquisition of Force 10 Networks, announced Wednesday morning, according to executives.
While Force 10 has its own channel, the company sells principally to end users now, especially its high-end products, said Dell's Brad Anderson, senior vice president of Dell's Enterprise Solutions Group.
Once Force 10 is integrated under Dell's Enterprise Solutions Group, expect to see Dell try to recruit its legacy VARs to sell Force 10 and get Force 10 VARs to sell more Dell.
"We absolutely are going to embrace the channel much like we did with our storage acquisitions, with Compellent being the most recent one, where their volume went through the channel," Anderson said in a conference call with analysts. "We see this as a way to expand and develop a much more robust networking channel within Dell."
Anderson added that Dell also will sell Force 10 solutions through its direct sales force too. When asked on the call about potential channel conflict between Dell and Force 10 partners, Anderson dismissed the notion.
"As we build our channel partner network out, [VARs] are asking us to put more products and more complete solutions into their portfolio. This is a catalyst to significantly expand our networking presence in our existing channel and to grow hte channel with all the partners Force 10 brings to us," Anderson said.
Executives did not detail which products would be available to VARs or how Force 10 would fit into Dell's enterprise certification strategy. The deal is expected to close by the end of the summer, said executives at both companies.
Force 10 reported about $200 million in sales in the previous 12 months, 80 percent of that revenue from North America, said Dave Johnson, Dell's senior vice president of corporate strategy. Force 10 also has about 750 employees, most of whom work out of the company's headquarters in San Jose, Calif., or a research facility in India, Johnson said.
For more than a year, Dell has been open with its strategy to acquire a networking player. Most recently, Brocade was the company thought to be in Dell's sights, but Force 10 complements Dell's strategy to broaden its data center solution on an open-standard platform, Anderson said.
"This positions us in a high-growth area of the business and enhances our enterprise profitability. Most recently, we've been successful in [integrating acquisitions] in the storage arena. When you think about next-gen computing and intelligent data center management, networking is the next piece of the puzzle to execute on. This acquisition greatly enhances our solution with those that customers are asking for."
Dell's interest in acquiring more comprehensive networking solutions for the data center is sparked in part by projections for that space, said Dario Zamarian, vice president and general manager of Dell's networking business who will have responsibility for Force 10 after the deal closes.
Data center networking is expected to grow by a compounded annual growth rate of 21 percent through 2015, Zamarian said, much faster than the 3 percent growth forecast for the rest of the networking industry.

AMD Partners Concerned With Leadership Vacuum

Advanced Micro Devices has been without a CEO for more than six months, and its struggle to fill the position has partners worried about the future.
Andrew Kretzer, director of sales and marketing at Bold Data Technology, a Fremont, Calif.-based system builder, says the lack of leadership at AMD does not impact his business day-to-day, but it could negatively affect AMD's roadmap and long-term strategy.
"I certainly believe that when there is a void in leadership it affects the entire company and there is a trickle-down effect. I'm sure everyone who partners up with AMD would be happier if there was solid leadership in place," he said.
An AMD spokesperson said Thursday the company is still searching for a replacement but declined additional comment.
Former AMD CEO Dirk Meyer resigned in January after reaching an impasse with the board of directors over the direction of the company. According to reports, AMD's board was concerned that the company had failed to gain CPU market share under Meyer's watch and also lacked a presence in the tablet market.
A new CEO could help, but the problems at AMD go beyond the loss of executive leadership, said Larry Piland, president of Datel Systems, a San Diego, Calif.-based solution provider.
"They've lost so much momentum and mindshare that they don't seem to be part of the conversation anymore," Piland said. "AMD just doesn't come up [in customer discussions]. Five years ago they were in the conversation but now no one is asking about them."
However, analyst expectations for AMD's earnings call Thursday contradict this view. On average, analysts surveyed by Bloomberg News predicted net income of $49 million for AMD's second quarter on earnings of 7 cents per share. For the full year, analysts are forecasting earnings of 96 cents per share, which would be AMD's highest annual net income since 2000.
The ongoing CEO search will not overshadow improved earnings in the short term, but a long-term lack of leadership could be bad for business, according to Kent Tibbils, vice president of marketing at ASI, a Fremont, Calif.-based system builder.
"Investors will eventually want someone to define the future strategic direction," said Tibbils.
AMD offered the CEO spot to several industry executives, includingOracle Co-President Mark Hurd, EMC  Chief Operating Officer Pat Gelsinger and Carlyle Group Managing Director Greg Summe, but none were interested in the position,Bloomberg reported in June.
AMD's Q1 net income was $510 million, nearly double that of the previous year's quarter, and that was due in part to the launch of its Fusion APU platform, Thomas Seifert, interim CEO, said in April. AMD began shipping these processors in November.
About half of AMD’s notebook products that shipped in the first quarter were Brazos processors, the low-power APU platform that includes both Ontario and Zacate integrated graphics processors, Seifert said at the time. He also said AMD continued its lead in discrete graphics over the first quarter, citing Apple’s adoption in February of AMD Radeon graphics cards in its Macbook line.
Analyst's projections for the second quarter earnings reflect ongoing confidence in APU sales. Erik Stromquist, COO of CTL, a Portland, Ore.-based custom system builder, even joked that AMD should maintain the status quo. "They seem to be doing better now without a CEO in terms of their earnings. Maybe they should stick to this no CEO program," he said.

Fusion Sales Help Lead AMD To Q2 Profit

Advanced Micro Devices  boosted earnings in its fiscal second quarter as the company continues to search for a new CEO.
AMD reported second quarter revenue of $1.57 billion, down from $1.65 billion in the same quarter last year. Net income grew to $61 million on earnings of 8 cents per share, up from a loss of $43 million from the year-ago quarter.
Earnings increased during both Q1 and Q2, but the price of AMD shares has dropped more than 25 percent since the resignation of former CEO Dirk Meyer in January. The unfilled CEO position has some partners worried, but AMD's view is that Siefert and his executive team are doing so well that AMD can afford to take its time in finding his replacement.
"Thanks to the hard work of AMD’s management team led by Thomas Seifert, the company continues to execute well on its priorities and strategy and our operations remain sound," an AMD spokesperson said in an e-mail to CRN on Thursday. "This has afforded the Board the flexibility and latitude to invest in the time to find the right candidate with the vision and experience to lead AMD into the future."
AMD said earnings were driven by APU sales, including the recently launched A-series Fusion chip, code-named Llano. The Llano accelerated processor unit (APU) includes a four-core CPU, DirectX 11 graphics support and more than 10 hours of battery life. The chip is primarily intended for high-end and mainstream notebooks as well as mainstream desktops.
“Today’s computing experience is increasingly being defined by the ability to deliver brilliant multimedia and video content with all day battery life," said Seifert in a statement. "Fusion APUs are ideal to meet this need, positioning AMD to gain unit market share in the mobile computing space.”
An accelerated tablet roadmap will be part of AMD's strategy moving forward, Seifert said. This comes over six months after Meyer resigned amid reports that AMD's board was concerned with the company's lack of a presence in the tablet market. Seifert said an optimized APU for tablets will launch in 2013.
AMD estimates a 10 percent increase in revenue for Q3 based on strong expectations for APU sales.

Lijit Ad Wijit

add this

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...